ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Treatment Summary and Care Plan for Breast Cancer Survivors: acceptability and feasibility study.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the Treatment Summary and Care Plan for Breast Cancer Survivors (TSSCP-P Br) document. this was a cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study involving women who had completed treatment for breast cancer (n=50) and nurses (n=10) who incorporated the document into the care plan at outpatient follow-up appointments during the experimental phase of a clinical study. The feasibility and acceptability questionnaires were administered in the last data collection stage of the experiment. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. in the evaluation of the surviving women, feasibility showed retention of 98.0% and adherence of 99.3%. Acceptability in terms of suitability, convenience, efficacy and adherence reached 81.6%. From the professionals' perspective, feasibility and acceptability were 84.2%, in terms of suitability, convenience, effectiveness, risks, availability, training, fidelity, reach and resources. The document was praised and the main problems in practice were pointed out, such as professional experience. the Treatment Summary and Care Plan proved to be feasible and acceptable for the clinical practice of caring for women who have survived breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.