ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Clinical simulation for the development of communication and teamwork in nursing.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Autonomy and Group Cohesion in Clinical Simulation: A Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Two Training Approaches.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Nursing faculty perceptions of soft skills teaching in undergraduate nursing education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to implement a realistic simulation scenario aimed at developing communication and teamwork skills in nursing undergraduates and analyzing its contributions during hospital internships. exploratory study conducted with 27 final-year nursing students from a higher education institution. Data were collected in 2021 using a checklist and a validated scenario centered on communication and teamwork in the hospital setting. Data collection took place in two stages: first, during the execution of the scenario/debriefing in the institution's skills lab, and later, after the completion of the hospital internship, through semi-structured interviews. The debriefing and interviews discussions were analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. during the debriefing stage, the undergraduate students reflected on their participation in the scenario, the case resolution, and their experiences with communication and teamwork. In the interviews, the students expressed a desire to include additional academic disciplines in the simulated classes and highlighted the benefits of using simulation in hospital practice. the simulation deepened the students' understanding by fostering critical and reflective thinking on communication and teamwork during their hospital internship, thus highlighting the value of its implementation throughout their university education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.