ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025
Transcutaneous spinal random noise stimulation enhances motor memory consolidation and corticospinal transmission in humans.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stochastic resonance sensory input modulates the central nervous system's excitability, thereby possibly influencing motor skill learning and retention. We investigated the effects of transcutaneous spinal random noise stimulation (tsRNS) at the cervical level on motor skill learning and corticospinal transmission in healthy humans. Participants performed a 20 min visuomotor tracking training task requiring rapid shifts in pinch force, with motor performance tests conducted before, immediately after, 1 day after and 7 days after the training to assess motor skill learning and retention. During the task, participants received real or sham tsRNS for 20 and 0.5 min, respectively. Motor performance improved equally in both groups immediately after training; however, the real tsRNS group showed a higher performance than the sham group at 1 and 7 days post-training. Beta-band corticomuscular coherence increased immediately after training in both groups, and higher performance on 1 day after the training was positively correlated with a greater change in corticomuscular coherence. To elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the enhanced motor memory retention induced by tsRNS, we investigated its effects on cortical and spinal excitability. We observed increased intracortical facilitation and somatosensory evoked potential amplitude following tsRNS; however, the efficacy of cortico-motoneuronal synaptic transmissions and the excitability of spinal motoneurons remained unchanged. Collectively, tsRNS can enhance the corticospinal drive to spinal motoneurons indirectly by increasing the ascending afferent input strength and cortical excitability via the augmented activity of facilitatory interneurons, resulting in improved motor memory retention. Thus, tsRNS may have important clinical applications for rehabilitation after central nervous system lesions. KEY POINTS: Stochastic resonance sensory input modulates the excitability of the central nervous system and may influence motor skill learning and motor memory retention. Transcutaneous spinal random noise stimulation (tsRNS) applied at the cervical level can enhance motor skill learning and motor memory retention in healthy humans. tsRNS can increase the ascending afferent input to the cortex and the excitability of the intracortical circuits rather than directly modulating the descending motor output, resulting in improved motor memory retention. These findings suggest that tsRNS is an effective strategy for promoting functional motor recovery of the upper limb after the development of central nervous system lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.