Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40736002›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2026

Emerging Protein Therapeutics as a Strategy for Cervical Cancer Treatment.

Srishti Sharma, Anuja Mishra, Pratibha Pandey, Meenakshi Verma, Ashok Kumar Bishoyi, S Renuka Jyothi, Sorabh Lakhanpal, Laxmidhar Maharana, Ashish Singh Chauhan, Mohammad Mustufa Khan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Srishti SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh; India.
Anuja MishraDepartment of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh; India.
Pratibha PandeyCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India.
Meenakshi VermaDepartment of Biotechnology, University Centre of Research and Development, Chandigarh University Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Ashok Kumar BishoyiMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
S Renuka JyothiDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sorabh LakhanpalSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
Laxmidhar MaharanaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751030, India.
Ashish Singh ChauhanUttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Mohammad Mustufa KhanDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Integral Institute of Allied Health Sciences & Research (IIAHSR), Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226026, India.
Fahad KhanCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer continues to be a critical public health concern globally, with increasing mortality rates, particularly in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) where healthcare resources remain limited. With more than 300,000 fatalities each year, it is the fourth most frequent cancer in women globally. Long-term infection with carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) variants, which cause cancer through viral proteins including E5, E6, and E7, is the leading cause of cervical cancer. These proteins interfere with host cellular functions, which promote the development and spread of cancer. Conventional treatment strategies, including chemotherapeutics and immunotherapies, have achieved varying degrees of success. However, protein-based therapeutics have recently emerged as a promising class of agents in oncology due to their ability to modulate specific molecular targets with high precision and specificity. These biologics interact with cell surface receptors and orchestrate essential signalling cascades, such as the NF-κB, MAPK, and PI3K/AKT pathways. Notably, new classes of protein therapeutics, such as toxin-based agents and Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) domain inhibitors, have shown effectiveness in disrupting tumor-promoting pathways. In addition to their direct antitumor activities, protein therapeutics also modify the tumor microenvironment, affecting stromal elements and lymphatic architecture, and ultimately promoting apoptosis. This review critically examines the landscape of protein-based therapeutic approaches for cervical cancer, delineating their mechanisms of action and highlighting their role in targeting inflammatory pathways-such as inflammasomes and cytokine networks-that contribute to tumor progression and immune modulation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsapoptosisCervical cancerHPVprotein therapeuticssignaling pathwayTME

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.