ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2026
Efficacy of Venlafaxine and Deep Brain Stimulation Against the Effects of Hippocampal Lesion with Ibotenic Acid in Animals Exposed to the Chronic Mild Stress Model of Depression.
Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDysfunction of the pathway between the ventral hippocampus (vHPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) may be responsible for the weaker or lack of efficacy of antidepressant drugs in patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression. This study aims to evaluate the behavioural effects of vHPC lesion with ibotenic acid (IBO) in animals subjected to the chronic mild stress (CMS) procedure and treated with either chronic venlafaxine or acute deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the mPFC. In addition, electrophysiological studies are expected to reveal neuromodulatory effects on the function and plasticity of mPFC neurons in response to stress, lesion, and deep brain stimulation (DBS).
methodsWistar Han rats were exposed to the chronic mild stress model of depression and IBO lesion in vHPC. The effects of both procedures were evaluated in a series of behavioural tests (sucrose test, elevated plus maze, novel object recognition, and social interaction) and in electrophysiological recordings (field potential recording and LTP induction).
resultsThe CMS procedure caused a decrease in sucrose consumption, deficits in cognitive function and social interaction, and increased anxiety. The lesion in vHPC with IBO resulted in similar behavioral changes. Repeated (5 weeks) administration of venlafaxine (10 mg/kg, IP) reversed these deficits in stressed animals but was only partially effective in reversing the effects of IBO lesion in vHPC. In contrast, the neuromodulation strategy with DBS of the mPFC produced a robust reversal of all behavioural changes observed in both stressed and lesioned rats. The CMS did not affect the amplitude of field potentials in mPFC slices, but the induction of Long-Term Potentiation was impaired in these animals. The IBO lesion significantly reduced the amplitude of Field potentials as compared to unstressed rats. Both repeated venlafaxine and acute DBS normalized these effects of the IBO lesion. DISCUSSION: Observed effects were fully normalized by DBS in mPFC but not by venlafaxine, which only partially reversed the IBO lesion-induced effects. The weaker sensitivity of vHPC-lesioned animals to the therapeutic action of venlafaxine provides further evidence that insufficient transmission from the vHPC to the mPFC could be responsible for antidepressant non-response.
conclusionThese data support the hypothesis that resistance to antidepressant treatment may result from the inability of antidepressants to fully activate the impaired vHPC-PFC pathway, which could be overcome by the neuromodulatory properties of deep brain stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.