ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Influencing factors and dynamic changes of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China: From the perspective of machine learning analysis.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploring the influencing factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and summarizing countermeasures is of great significance for effectively addressing potential public health crises. Based on survey data from China, we employed a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model and conducted SHAP interpretability analysis. The results show that in the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines, the important factors include social norms, vaccine knowledge, anticipated regret, age, vaccine safety, social responsibility, education level, religious belief, vaccine effectiveness, and perceived severity. While for booster shots, the important variables include age, vaccination experience, vaccine knowledge, vaccine effectiveness, gender, perceived severity, concerns about the epidemic, social norms, anticipated regret, and sense of social responsibility. The differences in the composition and significance of these core predictive factors suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is dynamically evolving. This pattern of evolution is manifested as a shift in the decision - making basis from social norms to subjective experiences, in the focus of vaccines from safety - first to effectiveness - priority, and in the decision - making mechanism from emotion - dominated to cognition - driven. The research findings inspire us that when formulating vaccination strategies, multiple factors need to be comprehensively considered. Moreover, strategies should be adjusted in a timely manner according to changes in the vaccination stages to align with the shift in public concerns and decision - making mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.