ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025
Mechanisms underpinning spontaneous spinal cord regeneration.
Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal cord regeneration deploys cell-type specific developmental and non-developmental strategies to restore neuron diversity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Elevated phagocytic capacity directs innate spinal cord repair.Cell reports · 2026Article
- A reparative neutrophil subpopulation accelerates spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish by controlling macrophage inflammation via Il-4.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Zebrafish model for studying vascular development and vascular-related disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Regeneration in Xenopus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertebrates exhibit a range of regenerative capacities following spinal cord injury. At one end of the spectrum are chief regenerators, including teleost fish and urodele amphibians. At the other end, most mammalian species exhibit limited repair and multicellular complications following spinal cord injury. Pro-regenerative immune, glial and neuronal injury responses underlie innate spinal cord repair in highly regenerative vertebrates. In many instances, fundamental mechanisms of spinal cord repair represent ancestral neuroprotection mechanisms that are conserved but become overwhelmed by anti-regenerative effects in mammals. Reflecting recent advances in the field, we review how fine-tuned immune responses, pro-regenerative glial cell reactivity and multimodal neuronal repair direct innate spinal cord repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.