ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer on mortality and recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- USP1 Promotes Malignant Progression of Cervical Cancer Cells by Deubiquitinating and Stabilizing ATG13 to Enhance Autophagic Activity.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- A latent profile analysis of the pain-fatigue-sleep disturbance symptom clusters in postoperative cervical cancer patients: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- FIGO Cancer Report 2025: Transforming gynecologic oncology through global equity, technological innovation, and preventive strategies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer is among the most common cancers affecting women worldwide. The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2018 stages IA1-IB2, IIA1) typically involves a radical or simple hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. Postoperative management may include observation or tailored adjuvant therapy, such as radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, depending on individual pathological risk factors. However, these interventions are associated with significant complications: surgical management can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction, lymphocysts, and lower limb lymphedema, while radiotherapy may cause genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual toxicities. Less-radical surgery for selected cases could reduce surgical morbidity and advances in radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and other three-dimensional conformal radiation therapies, have the potential to enhance precision and reduce toxicity. Nonetheless, the morbidity associated with combining radical surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy remains an area of uncertainty, particularly in light of these emerging technologies. Most current data on this topic derive from retrospective studies involving heterogeneous populations and inconsistent quality-of-life assessment methods. Prospective studies employing standardized morbidity assessment tools are essential to determine the true impact of combined treatments compared to single-modality approaches. Future research should prioritize understanding the long-term effects of these treatment strategies, aiming to minimize adverse outcomes while maintaining optimal oncological control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.