ArticlePsychophysiology2025
The Interplay Between Tonic and Phasic Pupil Activity and Cognitive Flexibility and Stability.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Interplay Between Tonic and Phasic Pupil Activity and Cognitive Flexibility and Stability.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has shown that while larger phasic pupillary activity indexes lower switch costs and better performance on a Stroop task, greater tonic pupillary activity indexes greater exploration. However, the direct influence of tonic-phasic pupillary activity on cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability-two control modes that potentially trade off with each other-has not been systematically investigated. We examine these associations using a task that imposes varying requirements on flexibility (task switching) and stability (distractor inhibition). The task included ambiguous trials that captured participants' preference for cognitively flexible performance. Participants (n = 51) completed the task with pupillary measurement recording. We find a lower preference to voluntarily switch (lower flexibility preference) in individuals with higher switch costs (lower ability/effort exerted to be flexible) and in individuals with faster RTs on Distractor Inhibition trials (higher stability), indicating a possible trade off between an individual's cognitively stable performance and the preference to be flexible. Examining pupillary data, we show that a larger phasic pupillary response in Task Switch trials is associated with lower switch costs, that is, higher flexibility. Individuals with larger average tonic pupil diameter were less likely to voluntarily switch tasks in ambiguous trials (i.e., lower flexibility preference), contrary to our expectations. Finally, we observed that higher tonic pupillary measures predicted quicker errors on trials measuring cognitive stability and greater overall task disengagement. Taken together, our findings shed light on the differential relationships between phasic pupillary activity and tonic pupil diameter and stable versus flexible modes of cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.