ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Prospects for antibiotic-free poultry production in South Africa: An analysis of the enablers and stumbling blocks.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary supplementation with a multi-strainVeterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Impact of Functional Feed Additives and Lower Antibiotic Use on Poultry Meat Quality and Consumer Perception.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative effects ofVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of dietary supplementation with a thymol-carvacrol blend on growth performance and intestinal health of poultry.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, antibiotics have been widely used in intensive poultry production to enhance bird health, welfare, growth performance, and product safety. In South Africa, a significant proportion of antibiotics produced is used for growth promotion, contributing to the profitability of intensive poultry systems. Indeed, the country has recently been identified as one of the major contributors to the global increase in antibiotic use. While antibiotics play a crucial role in maintaining bird health, their subtherapeutic use as growth promoters contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pathogens as well as unacceptable levels of antibiotic residues in poultry products. Because of their negative impacts on the health of both humans and animals, antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) have been banned or restricted in some countries. Despite the global trend towards AGP-free poultry production, several developing countries, including South Africa, continue to rely on AGPs. The reluctance to transition to AGP-free systems is linked to stumbling blocks such as a lack of sustainable alternatives, higher disease burdens in tropical and subtropical regions, lower biosecurity, and inadequate regulatory and monitoring frameworks. Despite these challenges, there exists an impressive array of practices, technologies, and alternative antimicrobials that could be exploited to drive the transition to AGP-free poultry production. In this review, we examine the current state of AGP use in South African poultry, its role in fostering AMR, and the effectiveness of regulatory measures in curbing inappropriate antibiotic use. By exploring the stumbling blocks and enablers, the review provides a platform upon which the transition to AGP-free poultry production can be built in South Africa and other countries facing similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.