ArticlePragmatic and observational research2025
Association of Frequent Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Inhaler Prescriptions with Acute Cardiovascular Events.
Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risk During the 90-Day Vulnerable Window After COPD Exacerbations: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Yonder: Access and quality of life, vaccine hesitancy, SABAs and acute cardiovascular events, and air quality.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Frequent usage of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) reliever inhalers is strongly associated with exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in turn associated with cardiovascular events. Patients with high SABA usage commonly report symptoms of heart racing and palpitations. However, many patients who overuse SABA inhalers have no history of frequent exacerbations, and the cardiovascular risks of SABA overuse in these patients has been poorly described to date. Aim: To establish whether frequent SABA usage is associated with adverse acute cardiovascular events (ACE) in patients who do not have a history of frequent exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids. Methods: A case-series analysis was conducted with ACE as the event and SABA prescription as the exposure, comparing 3-month quarters with frequent SABA prescription to quarters with no SABA prescription, using primary care data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Results: About 97082 patients with at least one period of frequent SABA prescription and who had no more than one exacerbation requiring oral corticosteroids prior to first ACE formed the primary analysis population, and 63824 patients who had no oral corticosteroids prior to first ACE were included in a sensitivity analysis. A significantly increased incidence of ACE was evident during quarters in which SABA inhalers were prescribed compared to quarters without SABA prescription, with Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.80 (95% CI 1.70-1.89) for the primary analysis; IRR 2.20 (95% CI 2.02-2.46) for the sensitivity analysis. A clear dose response was evident with increasing risk as the number of SABA prescribed per quarter increased. Conclusion: Frequent SABA usage appears to be associated with an increased risk of ACE even in patients not having oral corticosteroids for exacerbations of asthma or COPD. The risks of frequent SABA usage need both further research and clinical consideration, and prescription of frequent SABA inhalers should not be viewed as a benign prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.