Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Locally-tailored vs. centrally-administered strategies for implementation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an integrated healthcare system: a qualitative research study.

Erin E Hahn, Corrine Munoz-Plaza, Chunyi Hsu, Nancy T Cannizzaro, Quyen Ngo-Metzger, Michael K Gould, Brian S Mittman, Melissa Hodeib, Devansu Tewari, Chun R Chao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04371887 (Comparing Strategies for Implementing Primary HPV Testing for Routine Cervical Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04371887 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparing Strategies for Implementing Primary HPV Testing for Routine Cervical Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorChun ChaoRan2019 to 2023Enrolled45,000ConditionsCervical Cancer, Human Papillomavirus, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Care UtilizationArmsLocal Tailoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erin E HahnDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Corrine Munoz-PlazaDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Chunyi HsuDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Nancy T CannizzaroDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Quyen Ngo-MetzgerDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Michael K GouldDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Brian S MittmanDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Melissa HodeibDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Riverside, CA, United States.
Devansu TewariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, CA, United States.
Chun R ChaoDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Primary human papillomavirus Materials and methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with internal medicine, family medicine and obstetrics/gynecology clinicians to gain insight into fidelity to the interventions and implementation strategies, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and recommendations. Participants from both arms of the trial were recruited. Interview guides were developed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We recruited physicians, licensed vocational nurses, and medical assistants after primary HPV screening had been implemented. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using a team coding approach, we developed an initial coding structure refined during iterative analysis; data were subsequently organized thematically into domains, key themes, and sub-themes using thematic analysis, followed by framework analysis informed by CFIR. Results: Thirty-two interviews were conducted. Participants in both arms of the trial noted high awareness, preparedness, buy-in, and fidelity to the new screening process. Initial barriers concerned specimen collection, proper ordering, and lab delays. An unanticipated barrier was the length of time needed to return lab results for reflexive cytology tests after a positive HPV result which reportedly increased patient anxiety. Participants in both arms reported fidelity to the centralized strategy (e.g., attending webinars, leadership announcements). In the local-tailored arm, few participants recalled the local-tailored resources. Discussion: The centralized strategy was perceived as highly acceptable and feasible, and fidelity to the associated interventions appear to be facilitators of practice change. Recommendations for improving implementation included patient education, outreach and ongoing clinician training. Findings can be applied to other health systems and settings considering primary HPV screening implementation, particularly those within the U.S. or with a similar health care model. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier #NCT04371887.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeninghealthcare delivery system changeimplementation strategiesprimary HPV screeningqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40735691
PMCPMC12303904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.