Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735638›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Brain Segregation and Integration Relate to Word-Finding Abilities in Older and Younger Adults.

Elise J Oosterhuis, Neil Bailey, Kate Slade, Patrick J C May, Helen E Nuttall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise J OosterhuisDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Neil BaileyCentral Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kate SladeDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Patrick J C MayDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Helen E NuttallDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-5603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that word-finding difficulties in older age are associated with functional and structural brain changes. Functional brain networks, measured through electroencephalography, reflect the brain's neurophysiological organisation. However, the utility of functional brain networks, to predict word-finding in older and younger adults has not yet been investigated. This study utilised eyes-closed resting-state electroencephalography data (61 channels) from the Leipzig Study for Mind-Body-Emotion Interactions dataset (Babayan et al., 2019) to investigate the relationship between functional brain networks and word-finding ability in 53 healthy right-handed younger (aged 20-35) and 53 (aged 59-77) older adults. Brain segregation reflects the efficiency of localised brain regions to process information, while brain integration reflects the efficiency of global information processing between distant brain regions. Word-finding ability was quantified as the number of orally produced words during a semantic and letter fluency task. Multiple linear regression revealed that, in older adults, greater synchronised brain activity was associated with lower semantic fluency. Irrespective of age, greater brain segregation was related to lower semantic fluency. Increased brain integration corresponded to greater semantic fluency in older adults. Both older and younger participants with a more optimised balance between brain segregation and integration performed better on semantic fluency. These findings suggest that word-finding ability seems to be related to brain segregation and integration, possibly indicating alterations in cognitive control or compensatory changes in brain activity. The article further provides a discussion on neural dedifferentiation, hyper-synchronisation, study limitations, and directions for future research.

Indexed as

brain integrationbrain segregationfunctional brain networksgraph theoryhealthy cognitive ageingword-finding ability

Identifiers

PMID40735638
PMCPMC12307025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.