ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Evaluation of the relationships between beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) blood levels and pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the relationships between beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) blood levels and pregnancy in primary care. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted in Bursa Uludağ University Family Health Center in Turkey between October 1 Results: The mean age of the 239 pregnant women who participated in the study was 28.74±4.02, and the mean total gestational age was 37.28±7.68 weeks. It was determined that 96.2% of the pregnant women had total β-hCG levels in the blood above 5 mIU/ml. Risk factors were present in 26.4% of the pregnant women, and 3.8% of them developed complications during pregnancy. Blood β-hCG levels were higher in those who had an additional disease during pregnancy, those who were on medication, those who had risk factors, and those who developed complications. While total β-hCG measurement levels were lower in those who had normal or cesarean live births, they were higher in those who had abortions (p=0.03). Conclusion: In our study, blood β-hCG levels were higher in pregnant women who had an additional disease, those who were on medication, those who had risk factors and those who developed complications. Total β-hCG measurement levels were lower in those who had normal or cesarean live births, while they were higher in those who had abortions. Different results in blood β-hCG levels require a holistic approach to evaluate pregnancy. In this critical process, the collaboration of family physicians with obstetrics, gynecology and other clinics is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.