Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735581›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Efficacy of different storage methods and duration of blood samples on biochemical indexes in healthy blood donors.

Yu Wang, Aijun Liu, Chao Li, Junpeng Zhao, Maqian Su, Zeyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu WangYu Wang Department of Quality Control, Tangshan Blood Stations, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.
Aijun LiuAijun Liu Department of Quality Control, Tangshan Blood Stations, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.
Chao LiChao Li Department of Hematology and Oncology, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing 100000, Beijing, China.
Junpeng ZhaoJunpeng Zhao Tangshan Food and Drug Comprehensive Inspection, Testing Center, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.
Maqian SuMaqian Su Blood Group Research Laboratory, Tangshan Blood Stations, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.
Zeyu WangZeyu Wang Department of 1 Blood Collection, Tangshan Blood Stations, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the efficacy of different blood specimen preservation methods and time on biochemical indicators of healthy blood donors. Method: This was a retrospective observational study. Two hundred healthy blood donors were selected as the study participants at Beijing Aerospace General Hospital from April 2023 to September 2023. According to the preservation method of blood samples, they were divided into three groups: ABC, Group-A was stored at room temperature (20°C), Group-B was stored at -20°C, and Group-C was stored at 4°C. Compared and analyzed the differences in biochemical indicators between different time periods and levels within one hour. Result: The results of various test indexes were measured within one hour, The levels of ALT, CK, LDH, GLU, Cr, and UA in Group-A changed after 12 h, AST and BUN changed after 24 hour, and ALB values changed significantly after one week (p<0.05); The GLU of Group-B changed after 12 hours, and the Cr changed after 24 hours, ALT, AST, CK, LDH, BUN, and UA levels changed after one week (p<0.05), while ALB levels remained unchanged (p=0.23); The video of ALT and LDH in Group-C showed changes after 24 hours, while the values of other indicators changed after one week (p<0.05). Conclusion: Under normal temperature storage, most indicators change within 12-24 hours. Storage at 4°C can delay the changes of some indicators, while -20°C is more suitable for short-term stable storage.

Indexed as

Biochemical IndexesBlood SamplesStorage DurationStorage Method

Identifiers

PMID40735581
PMCPMC12302102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.