Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735567›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Prediction of the composition of urinary calculi using artificial intelligence.

Dan Shen, Tianxiong Yang, Tao Ma, Wenzeng Yang, Hongmei Li, Zhenyu Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan ShenDan Shen Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Tianxiong YangTianxiong Yang College of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Tao MaTao Ma Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Wenzeng YangWenzeng Yang Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Hongmei LiHongmei Li Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Zhenyu CuiZhenyu Cui Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the capability and clinical application potential of the Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN), an Artificial intelligence algorithm, in identifying the composition of urinary calculi from CT images. Method: This was a retrospective study. Data from 776 patients with urinary calculi treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from August 2020 to December 2023 were collected. Patients with simple calculi were randomly divided into a model construction group and validation Group-I at a 5:1 ratio, while 60 cases of mixed calculi were randomly selected to form validation Group-II. The model construction group was employed to construct and test the performance of the Faster R-CNN model, while the validation groups were used to verify the model's performance. Results: In validation Group-I, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.843. In validation Group-II, the kappa values for the model's prediction of calcium oxalate and uric acid components, consistent with infrared spectroscopy analysis, were 0.649 and 0.653, respectively. Conclusion: Faster R-CNN demonstrates a robust capability for quantitative prediction of the composition of urinary calculi, indicating substantial promise for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Calculi CompositionFaster R-CNNUrinary Calculi

Identifiers

PMID40735567
PMCPMC12302084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.