ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Prediction of the composition of urinary calculi using artificial intelligence.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence model based on CT imaging for predicting infected upper urinary tract calculi.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the capability and clinical application potential of the Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN), an Artificial intelligence algorithm, in identifying the composition of urinary calculi from CT images. Method: This was a retrospective study. Data from 776 patients with urinary calculi treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from August 2020 to December 2023 were collected. Patients with simple calculi were randomly divided into a model construction group and validation Group-I at a 5:1 ratio, while 60 cases of mixed calculi were randomly selected to form validation Group-II. The model construction group was employed to construct and test the performance of the Faster R-CNN model, while the validation groups were used to verify the model's performance. Results: In validation Group-I, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.843. In validation Group-II, the kappa values for the model's prediction of calcium oxalate and uric acid components, consistent with infrared spectroscopy analysis, were 0.649 and 0.653, respectively. Conclusion: Faster R-CNN demonstrates a robust capability for quantitative prediction of the composition of urinary calculi, indicating substantial promise for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.