ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Facing the struggle alone; Insights into the experience of PhD scholars in Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Supervising PhD Candidates in Health and Medical Sciences: A Narrative Review of Strategies for Success.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Explore the key challenges encountered by PhD scholars in Pakistan and the coping strategies they employ to address these challenges. Method: A qualitative phenomenological approach with purposive sampling was used to conduct six in-depth interviews with PhD scholars and five in-depth interviews with the supervisors. Guiding questions were searched from the literature, authenticated by three experts in the Medical Education Department of Khyber Medical University, and piloted before implementing the study. The duration of the study was two years. Data was recorded verbatim using a Dictaphone. Transcription was done through transcriber software. Thematic analysis was performed. Results: Four themes were extracted, namely: Always alone in the struggle (subtheme: experience), Progress, not perfection (subtheme: enablers), confined by the invisible walls (subtheme: inhibitors/barriers), and the Key to Success (subtheme: recommendations). Conclusion: PhD is a lonely journey with many ups and downs during its progression. Enablers contain essential skills, dedication, and a robust support system. Socioeconomic status, marital status, and financial limits strongly influence this journey. Recommendations include financial support, workshops, encouraging self-reliance, and excellent time management. Understanding these factors provides a framework for establishing policies to enhance PhD scholars' success in the unique setting of developing nations like Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.