Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735517›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Bridging spatiotemporal wildfire prediction and decision modeling using transformer networks and fuzzy inference systems.

Parul Dubey, Pushkar Dubey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parul DubeySymbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Pushkar DubeyDepartment of Management, Pandit Sundarlal Sharma (Open) University Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires present a growing threat to ecosystems, human settlements, and climate stability, necessitating accurate and interpreted prediction systems. Existing AI-based models often prioritize performance over explainability, limiting their utility in real-time decision-making contexts. Current wildfire forecasting models struggle to incorporate uncertainty and offer transparent response strategies. Moreover, many models fail to integrate domain knowledge in a way that supports actionable interventions. This study utilizes the Canadian Fire Spread Dataset, augmented with Sentinel, ERA5, and SRTM data, encompassing vegetation, meteorological, and topographic variables. The suggested system uses a Transformer-based model to predict fires over time and space, along with a Fuzzy Rule-Based System (FRBS) to create rules for responding to those predictions. This integration allows for both high accuracy and interpretability in decision-making under uncertain environmental conditions. The novelty lies in the use of symbolic fuzzy reasoning layered onto a deep attention-based architecture. Performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. The model achieved an F1-score of 92.9 % and accuracy of 94.8 %, significantly outperforming baseline and deep learning alternatives. • Integrates deep learning with fuzzy logic for both accurate forecasting and interpretable response planning. • Enables uncertainty-aware reasoning by translating predictions into actionable fire management rules. • Demonstrates superior performance across diverse environmental datasets using multi-source satellite and climate inputs.

Indexed as

Explainable AI (XAI)Fuzzy Rule-Based System (FRBS)Spatiotemporal analysisTransformer modelWildfire prediction

Identifiers

PMID40735517
PMCPMC12304742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.