Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735473›Full record

ArticleEcological modelling2025

Inferring the relative importance of navigation and landscape effects for migratory populations using agent-based models.

Mitchell J Kendzel, Jacobus C de Roode, Lance A Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological modelling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mitchell J KendzelDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-359X
Jacobus C de RoodeDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322, USA.
Lance A WallerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322, USA.

Funding

Refined Capture-Recapture Methods for Surveilling Cancer RecurrenceR01CA266574 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LYLES, ROBERT H, WALLER, LANCE A · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal migration is a vital behavior for numerous animal species, offering ecological services such as seed dispersal, pollination, and resource influxes. However, accurately describing and predicting the spatial dynamics of migrating populations remains a challenge due to the scale of the behavior and the different navigation strategies employed by the animals to complete it. The goal of this study is two-fold: (1) to develop an agent-based model (ABM) to simulate the final spatial distributions of migratory animals using two navigation strategies-true navigation and vector navigation-and (2) to use a case study of migratory monarch butterflies to determine the value of comparing model-generated spatial patterns with empirical observations. True navigators are hypothesized to use a combination of location and directional information to reach specific destinations, while vector navigators follow consistent directions throughout their journey, without altering these directions with respect to their current location. Therefore, it is logical to assume that true navigators would be more accurate in reaching specific destinations than vector navigators. Our model was designed to test this assumption by investigating the spatial distribution of migrants traveling across landscapes characterized by water bodies and elevational gradients. While true navigators were indeed more likely to reach their destinations than vector navigators on homogeneous landscapes, our model revealed that heterogeneous landscapes can successfully channel vector navigators to their destinations. Applying the model to monarch butterflies, we found that simulated distributions based on vector navigation closely matched observed overwintering locations. This not only demonstrates the utility of our model in generating spatial patterns that can be compared to empirical data, but also reveals that vector navigation across a heterogeneous landscape is a plausible strategy that would allow western monarch butterflies to reach their overwintering sites. The analysis also highlighted limitations in the observed data, such as biases introduced by preferential sampling, emphasizing the need for improved data collection methodologies. This study demonstrates the utility of ABMs in linking hypothesized navigation processes to observed migratory patterns, offering a framework for investigating and distinguishing navigation strategies in varying migratory species.

Indexed as

Agent-based modelsMigration ecologySpecies distribution modelsTrue navigationVector navigation

Identifiers

PMID40735473
PMCPMC12306194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.