ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
An integrated approach for analyzing spatially resolved multi-omics datasets from the same tissue section.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics-driven precision medicine.iMeta · 2026Review
- Spatial Immune Coding in Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes: Functional Compartmentalization of Immune Activation and Immunosuppression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- CTMAP: an adversarial cross-modal learning framework for accurate and robust cell-type annotation in single-cell resolution spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Bridging the Precision Gap in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Spatial Transcriptomics, Spatial Proteomics, and Artificial Intelligence in Precision Health.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- GALA: a unified landmark-free framework for coarse-to-fine spatial alignment across resolutions and modalities in spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- BEEP Learning: Multi-View Image Decomposition for Massively Multiplexed Biological Fluorescence Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The central role of EMT in tumor progression: mechanistic drivers, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic horizons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in spatial transcriptomics (ST) and spatial proteomics (SP) technologies have enabled high-dimensional molecular profiling at single-cell resolution, providing deeper insights into the tumour-immune microenvironment. However, these modalities are typically applied to separate tissue sections, limiting direct comparisons across molecular layers. We developed a wet-lab and computational framework to perform and integrate ST and SP from the same tissue section, as demonstrated on human lung cancer samples. Applying ST, SP, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining from the same section ensured consistency in tissue morphology and spatial context. Computational registration using Weave software allowed accurate alignment and annotation transfer across modalities. This co-registered dataset enabled single-cell level comparisons of RNA and protein expression, revealed segmentation accuracy and transcript-protein correlation analyses within individual cells. Notably, we observed systematic low correlations between transcript and protein levels-consistent with prior findings-now resolved at cellular resolution. Our approach highlights the feasibility and utility of performing spatially-resolved multi-omics analysis on the same section without compromising data quality, facilitating concordance studies and region-specific analysis of immune and tumour markers, and ultimately advancing our understanding of disease heterogeneity at the molecular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.