ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Cell type prediction with neighborhood-enhanced cellular embedding using deep learning on hematoxylin and eosin-stained images.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to predict the cell types that infiltrate the tumor microenvironment using hematoxylin and eosin-stained images from colon cancer and breast cancer samples. Methods: Two datasets, one focused on colon cancer and the other on breast cancer, were used to develop deep learning models. Cell segmentation was performed using Stardist, followed by the K-Nearest Neighbor method to construct a neighborhood-enhanced cellular extraction matrix for model training. Transductive semi-supervised learning was applied to the breast cancer dataset, where the Base-4 model was trained on S1 and S2 samples and subsequently used to generate assigned labels for the S3, S4, and S5 sets, on which the Base-4+ model was trained. Results: The Base-7 model trained on colon cancer cell images achieved accuracy of 0.85 on the hold-out test set and 0.74- on the independent test set, with six neighboring cells identified as the optimal condition for prediction. In addition, the Base-4 model achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.69 with four neighboring cells as the optimal condition in the breast cancer dataset, while the Base-4+ model reached an accuracy of up to 0.93 on the validation set. The model also captured invasive and ductal carcinoma cells with overall agreement relative to spot-based cell types (0.63). Conclusions: Deep learning models accurately predicted cell types in breast and colon cancer datasets using only cell morphology and neighborhood embedding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.