Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735426›Full record

ReviewAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2025

Exploring human-animal interactions beyond academic research: A rapid review of grey literature.

Siyu Ru, Daniel Villarreal Hernandez, Szymon Parzniewski, Haorui Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siyu RuSchool of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0550-860X
Daniel Villarreal HernandezBedford Parks Animal Hospital, Bedford, NS B4B 2E6, Canada.
Szymon ParzniewskiSchool of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-4428
Haorui WuSchool of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-0452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing recognition of the diverse benefits of human-animal interactions (HAIs) has propelled related studies. Although most of the benefits have been illustrated by academic literature (e.g. journal articles, academic theses, and project reports), the grey literature contributes to a comprehensive understanding of HAIs and offers new perspectives, informing prospective research, practices, and policies. Adapting the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, this rapid review examined 151 articles covering HAIs from 2016-2022. The univariate analysis results revealed that the sources covered various animal species (e.g. dogs, cats, birds), types of animals (e.g. companion animals, therapy animals, zoo animals), and vulnerable populations (e.g. older adults, people with disabilities). HAIs could be found across different settings, such as households, schools, healthcare facilities, and more. The thematic analysis identified three primary categories associated with HAIs' benefits in public education: (1) HAIs benefit the well-being of individuals, families, and animals; (2) HAIs promote prosocial behaviours and community development; and (3) HAIs improve disaster preparedness and response. The results highlight the multifaceted positive influences of HAIs on human well-being, animal welfare, and building healthy and resilient communities. Grey literature plays an essential role in knowledge mobilisation through public education, promoting the interconnectedness between human well-being and animal welfare.

Indexed as

Animal welfaregrey literature reviewhuman-animal interactionshuman-animal welfarepublic educationresilience

Identifiers

PMID40735426
PMCPMC12304773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.