Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735389›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025

Exploring bioadhesion: insight on innovative strategies to investigate bioadhesive scaffolds.

Marta Pollini, Eleonora Bianchi, Marco Ruggeri, Barbara Vigani, Silvia Rossi, Giuseppina Sandri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta PolliniDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Eleonora BianchiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Marco RuggeriDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Barbara ViganiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Silvia RossiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppina SandriDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the pharmaceutic field, materials with enhanced bioadhesive properties have been widely employed to produce scaffolds with deep interaction and adhesion to the biological surfaces, preventing them from dislocation and promoting cell homing, proliferation and growth. Parallelly, mucoadhesion has been extensively used to increase formulation retention onto the mucosal surface. This review aims to describe the most appropriate and relevant techniques to evaluate scaffolds bioadhesion and mucoadhesion for biomedical application, and more in details, in wound healing treatment. Different methods will be reviewed and described in order to provide an overview of the traditional approaches and the most innovative and recent tools. In addition, critical considerations on the variety of biological substrates that could be used will be reported to underline the different alternatives for testing bioadhesion, including

Indexed as

BioadhesionBioadhesive materialsBiomaterialsMucoadhesionTissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID40735389
PMCPMC12305734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.