ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025
Death and dying during the COVID-19-pandemic - A qualitative evaluation of stress factors for nursing staff.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed an unprecedented challenge for the healthcare system worldwide and led to high levels of psychosocial stress, particularly among nursing staff working in special COVID-19 wards. As previous studies have shown, this stress has had a profound impact on mental health, underscoring the need for further research to deepen our understanding of these effects. Objectives: To investigate the experiences of nursing staff working on special COVID-19 wards during the COVID-19 pandemic with regard to the death and dying of patients. Methods: To uncover aspects that might have remained unobserved in a quantitative survey, a qualitative research design was chosen for data collection. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed 14 nurses about their experiences. The data was then analysed using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results: Nursing staff were exposed to a particularly high level of stress. The reasons for this included the lack of opportunities for end-of-life care, patients dying alone, an above-average level of confrontation with death and serious disease progression and finally, limited treatment options and specialised care for deceased patients. These factors led to moral injuries. Conclusion: The results emphasise the urgency of better preparing nursing staff for future crises, providing psychosocial support and developing preventive strategies against moral distress. The promotion of resilience and the creation of conditions that prevent moral injury are essential to minimise the long-term effects of such stress and to protect the mental health of nursing staff in the long term. Trial registration: Registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies under the number DRKS00030425.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.