Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735336›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2025

Machine Learning Techniques in Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Comparative Study of Classification Model Performance.

Nguyen Dong Phuong, Nguyen Trung Tuyen, Vu Thi Thai Linh, Nghi N Nguyen, Thanh Q Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nguyen Dong PhuongCIRTech Institute, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8100-9552
Nguyen Trung TuyenFaculty of Information Technology, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vu Thi Thai LinhFaculty of Information Technology, Ly Tu Trong College of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nghi N NguyenHospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City Dermatology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thanh Q NguyenInstitute of Interdisciplinary Sciences, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-091X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidneys are vital organs responsible for filtering and eliminating toxins from the body. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming increasingly prevalent, affecting not only older adults but also younger populations. To minimize kidney damage for those at risk, an accurate assessment and monitoring of CKD are crucial. Machine learning models can assist physicians in this task by providing fast and accurate detection. As a result, many health care systems have adopted machine learning, especially for disease diagnosis. In this study, we developed a system to support the diagnosis of CKD. The data were collected from the UCL machine learning database, with missing values filled using the "mean/mode" and the "random sampling method." After data processing, we applied the polynomial technique to generate additional features, allowing the models to be better generalized. Then, we utilized feature-based stratified splitting with K-means and implemented 6 machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine [SVM], Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor [KNN], and XGBoost) to compare their performance based on accuracy. Among them, Random Forest, XGBoost, SVM, and logistic regression achieved the highest accuracy of 100%, followed by Naive Bayes (97%) and KNN (93%).

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseasedata balancinghealth careK-means clusteringKolmogorov-Smirnov testmachine learningmedical datastratified train-test split

Identifiers

PMID40735336
PMCPMC12304504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.