Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Neutralizing antibody response to Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.5 in children and adolescents following the two-dose CoronaVac protocol (Immunita-002, Brazil): a 12-month longitudinal study.

Camila Amormino Corsini, Guilherme Rodrigues Fernandes Campos, Priscila Fernanda da Silva Martins, Priscilla Soares Filgueiras, Ana Esther de Souza Lima, Sarah Vieira Contin Gomes, Caroline De Almeida Leitao Curimbaba, Daniela Aparecida Lorencini, Eolo Morandi Junior, Victor Mattos da Silva and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Camila Amormino CorsiniInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Guilherme Rodrigues Fernandes CamposFaculty of Medicine of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Priscila Fernanda da Silva MartinsInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Priscilla Soares FilgueirasInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Esther de Souza LimaInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sarah Vieira Contin GomesInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Caroline De Almeida Leitao CurimbabaInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Aparecida LorenciniInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eolo Morandi JuniorInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victor Mattos da SilvaInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Célia CerviFaculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos de Carvalho BorgesFaculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Poliana Remundini de LimaSerrana Clinical Research Center, Serrana, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo Resende do NascimentoSerrana Clinical Research Center, Serrana, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Roberto Lopes CorreaBelo Horizonte Municipal Health Department (SMS), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Leda Dos Reis CastilhoCell Culture Engineering Laboratory (COPPE), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jaquelline Germano de OliveiraInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Olindo Assis Martins FilhoInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maurício Lacerda NogueiraFaculty of Medicine of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafaella Fortini Queiroz E GrenfellInstituto René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The covid-19 pandemic prompted an unprecedented global effort to develop and deploy vaccines, including CoronaVac, an inactivated virus-based vaccine. While these vaccines effectively reduced severe cases and hospitalizations, limited data exists on their immunogenicity in younger populations, particularly children and adolescents. Understanding the immune response in these groups is essential to guide vaccination strategies and assess protection against emerging variants of concern, such as Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.5. This study evaluated the neutralizing antibody response in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years over 12 months following the two-dose CoronaVac protocol in Brazil. Methods: A cohort of 108 children (3-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) from Serrana, Brazil, received two doses of CoronaVac. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the second dose. Participants were stratified by serostatus prior to vaccination. Neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 were assessed using microneutralization assays. Results: Neutralizing antibody titers increased significantly after vaccination in both seronegative and seropositive individuals. For seronegative participants, seroconversion rates for BA.5 rose from 16.6% pre-vaccination to 93.3% one month after the second dose in children, and from 50% to 92% in adolescents, with sustained levels for 12 months. Seropositive participants also showed enhanced antibody titers, particularly against BA.5. No significant differences in neutralization between BA.1 and BA.5 were observed post-vaccination, contrary to prior literature, suggesting uniform effectiveness against these subvariants. Discussion: This study demonstrates that CoronaVac significantly enhances and sustains neutralizing antibody titers in children and adolescents for up to one year, including against immune-evading subvariants like BA.5. The robust response highlights the vaccine's potential as a critical tool for reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and preventing severe disease, particularly in regions with limited access to updated vaccines. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and inform vaccination strategies for immunoresistant variants.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2AdolescentBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivatedchildren and adolescentscovid-19neutralizing antibodyOmicronSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID40735326
PMCPMC12306644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.