ArticleJournal of bone oncology2025
Effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment for bone metastasis patients without surgical intervention: A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between fat-free mass index and severe locomotive syndrome in patients with cancer: sex-specific cutoff values.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments in patients with bone metastases remains limited. This study evaluated the implementation and effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with bone metastases who did not undergo surgery. This retrospective study included 200 patients with nonsurgically treated bone metastases at our institution. The patients were categorized into a rehabilitation group (R group, n = 61) and a non-rehabilitation group (N group, n = 139). Over the course of one month, we compared activities of daily living (ADL), assessed using the Barthel Index (BI), quality of life (QOL), measured using the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score matching was conducted to minimize selection bias. After matching, 31 patients in each group were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline BI and EQ-5D scores between the two groups. In the R group, BI improved significantly from 80 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-100) to 90 (IQR: 70-100), and EQ-5D improved from 0.444 (IQR: 0.282-0.608) to 0.608 (IQR: 0.533-0.768). In contrast, no improvements were observed in either score in the N group. Chemotherapy was identified as a significant factor associated with improvements in BI (odds ratio 4.03) and EQ-5D (odds ratio 5.29). Rehabilitation may be a valuable treatment option for nonsurgically treated patients with bone metastases, warranting further validation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.