Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735283›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

The impact of anatomical recipient liver abnormalities on rat liver transplantation.

Yongfeng Chen, Wenzhong Li, Guoyong Chen, Shaotang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yongfeng Chen6th Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenzhong Li *Acupuncture and Massage Department, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Guoyong Chen6th Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shaotang Zhou *6th Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orthotopic rat liver transplantation (OLT) is widely used in basic research; normal liver anatomy and structures are attributable to its success, but its deformities are complicated by a negative OLT. Methods: For tolerance induction, we used OLT from Lewis to Brown Norway (BN) rats as a chronic rejection model and encountered two anatomical deformities in the recipient livers. The outcomes of OLT were analyzed. Results: Of the 47 liver transplantations, the accessory liver lobe occurred in four cases, and bifurcations of liver outflow occurred in five cases in BN rats. For the accessory liver lobe, we discontinued OLT in one patient with a large accessory liver lobe. Two rats died from pneumothorax upon separation, and one case succeeded with a small lobe. For two vein outflow orifices of the liver, we succeeded in OLT due to its reconstruction in one case; however, the recipient died 1 week later in one case, after one small orifice was sutured. We failed in three cases due to thrombosis following OLT. Among the 38 rats with normal liver anatomy, only four failed to survive the LT. There were significant differences in OLT success ( Conclusion: The recipient's liver abnormal anatomical structure has a negative impact on OLT, suggesting that pretransplant comprehensive screening is important and that clinicians are cautious in clinical practice.

Indexed as

liver accessory lobeliver deformityorthotopic liver transplantationoutcometwo liver outflows

Identifiers

PMID40735283
PMCPMC12306482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.