ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Using a co-created checklist to improve on-farm biosecurity: an observational pilot intervention with pig farmers and livestock field officers in Sumbawanga, Tanzania.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and associated biosecurity practices in peri-urban dairy farms.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Tanzanian pig sector has the capacity to become market-oriented but it is constrained by significant factors like poor husbandry, management practices and disease, like African swine fever (ASF). Good biosecurity is essential to prevent, minimise or even eliminate biosecurity risks on farms. This study aimed to evaluate a pilot intervention based on an innovative, participatory approach to progressively improve biosecurity practices on small- and medium-scale pig farms in Tanzania. An observational study was conducted, where 30 farms were systematically monitored to assess the impact of using a co-created checklist on biosecurity compliance and production parameters. Livestock field officers (LFOs) were trained to provide technical guidance to farmers to implement the checklist. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with LFOs, which were coded and thematically analysed. The median compliance score for biosecurity was significantly higher after the pilot intervention (20.0 out of 26 practices or 76.9%) compared to baseline (median of 5.50 out of 26 practices 21.2%). The time spent implementing biosecurity per sow (per day) increased from a median of 7.8-18.6 min by the end of the intervention. Pre-weaning mortality decreased from 28.6 to 25.0% and cost of antimicrobial use per sow (per month) was reduced by 57%. Meanwhile, FGDs revealed that the pilot intervention allowed LFOs to connect with farmers to provide services and collaborate with other LFOs to co-develop solutions for farmers. Despite an initial lack of trust, the relationships between LFOs and farmers were described to have positively transformed. These findings highlight the potential of using bottom-up approaches, combined with sensitisation and capacity-building, to address the unique challenges of biosecurity in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.