ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with anti-AMPAR2 encephalitis: a case series and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial Cerebral Blood Flow Changes in AMPAR Encephalitis Presenting with Left Hemiplegia and Nonfluent Aphasia.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Adaptive immune dysregulation drives new-onset refractory status epilepticus.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor encephalitis is a rare autoimmune encephalitis, with only a few series describing its typical clinical manifestations and prognosis. Here, we present three newly identified patients with anti-AMPAR encephalitis and were followed up for prognostic evaluation. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range, 32-57). All three patients experienced memory issues, with two showing signs of typical limbic encephalitis (LE). Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in two patients demonstrated lesions in the bilateral temporal lobes, insula, and cingulate gyrus as well as significant cortical atrophy after 1 month of follow-up. No acute lesions were observed on cranial MRI in the third patient at the onset of symptoms. One patient had positive antibodies for both AMPAR1 and AMPAR2 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), while the other two patients only had positive antibodies for AMPAR2. Severe clinical symptoms and high CSF antibody levels were found in two patients. Immunotherapy demonstrated partial efficacy in all three patients. Two patients exhibited favorable responses to first-line immunotherapy. In contrast, the third patient experienced a suboptimal response to the initial treatment, with no remission and subsequent disease relapse. Following second-line immunotherapy, her condition stabilized; however, she continued to suffer from significant cognitive impairment. One patient was diagnosed with a viral infection, but no tumors were found in any patients. Besides its typical manifestation as LE, anti-AMPAR2 encephalitis may also present as simple amnesia. It is advised to monitor CSF antibodies and their level changes. While first-line immunotherapy is partially effective, some patients may need additional second-line therapy. Viral infections could be a predisposing factor; thus, routine CSF virus testing is recommended. Additionally, screening for tumors and follow-up assessments are also important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.