SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Weight bias in mental health settings: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Awareness to Action: Advancing Counselor Education Policy to Improve Early Detection of Eating Disorders Through Embodied Reflection.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Eating Behaviour in Mental Health Care: An Underexplored Perspective From Dietitians and Other Clinicians.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Weight bias is a pervasive form of prejudice, most deeply and directly harming individuals in larger bodies. Although the mental health field strives to promote the delivery of equitable, culturally sensitive care, the prevalence and nature of weight bias in therapeutic contexts are not well understood. This scoping review examines how weight bias manifests within mental health settings and its impacts on client care and outcomes, exploring the issue from both client and provider lenses. Methods: A total of 43 studies meeting search criteria were identified from a systematic search process. Results: Findings indicate that mental health professionals (MHPs) hold negative stereotypes toward larger-bodied individuals. Although MHPs were less likely to report having negative attitudes, they reported a high prevalence of weight bias in their colleagues. Studies using experimental designs demonstrated that providers' clinical judgment and decision-making were impacted by client body size, generally showing that higher-weight clients were perceived to have lower global functioning, greater pathology, and more negative attributes than lower-weight clients. When the client was described with restrictive eating disorder symptomatology, however, MHPs rated higher-weight clients as less severe and recommended less intensive treatment compared to lower-weight clients. Qualitative studies from client samples revealed experiences of weight stigma during treatment, including MHPs' expressions of implicit and explicit weight bias, assumptions and misattributions based on the clients' weight, unsolicited (direct or subtle) weight loss advice, and differential treatment based on size. Experiences of weight bias were harmful to the client's therapeutic progress and undermined their trust in their provider and the mental health system at large. Discussion: The body of evidence suggests that weight bias is a serious and significant barrier to the provision of equitable mental health treatment and mental health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.