ArticleNature reviews bioengineering2024
Sex-specific nanomedicine- and biomaterials-based therapies of chronic wounds.
Article in Nature reviews bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High glucose-primed HUVEC-derived extracellular vesicles encapsulated in microgels boost diabetic ischaemic flap regeneration via HIF-1α/VEGF pathway.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Gold Nanoparticles, Extracts, and Topical Formulations Prepared withACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- Multiscale interface engineering in biohybrid composites for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- The Importance of Sex-Based Comparisons in Preclinical Nanomedicine and Regenerative Chronic Wound Therapies.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Polymeric Nanomedicines in Diabetic Wound Healing: Applications and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Analysis of Biogenic Amines and Small Molecule Metabolites in Human Diabetic Wound Ulcer Exudate.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wound healing mechanisms differ depending on the sex, particularly in chronic wounds. Therefore, sex should be considered in the design of nanomedicine- and biomaterials-based wound healing therapies, both in preclinical and clinical testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.