ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Reassessing the two-stage theory of social learning development: a discussion.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reevaluates the two-stage development theory of social learning by examining the distinct roles of pedagogical and selective learning. Pedagogical learning involves infants' sensitivity to adults' communicative intentions, while selective learning highlights how infants prioritize information from reliable sources. Over time, the influence of pedagogical learning diminishes, whereas selective learning continues to play a central role as children grow. We argue for the distinctiveness and plurality of human social learning and emphasize the foundational role of multiple social interactions in cognitive development. Special attention is given to the transition from reliance on pedagogical cues to selective learning, underscoring the critical role of educators in facilitating this shift. We conclude by highlighting the increasing sophistication of cognitive and social selection processes in observation, imitation, and learning, alongside the implications for educational practices. Future research should investigate differences between social and other forms of learning, the mechanisms underlying the diminishing effects of pedagogical cues with age, the cultural variability in social learning trajectories, and the impact of educational technology on the development of social learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.