ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Sustaining Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From Medical Education for Community-Academic Partnerships.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: We describe a novel evaluation of attitudes toward engagement with a required medical school course from the perspective of the participating community organizations. We then consider lessons learned about sustained community engagement from this longstanding community-academic partnership and potential implications for public health and research partnerships. The aim of this observational study is to assess facilitators of community engagement to improve engagement with community organizations. Methods: Data collection consisted of end-of-course evaluations collected from community mentors of the student teams. Surveys were completed at the end of each course and they used a common set of questions across cohorts. Data from the Class of 2019 through the Class of 2026 were analyzed using a qualitative framework and descriptive statistics. Results: One hundred mentors completed surveys across 7 years of measurement. The most frequently cited reasons for participating are interest in influencing the training of health professionals, needing additional help, and wanting a relationship with the university. Community organizations agreed or strongly agreed that the community/people served benefitted from projects and that the relationships will continue. Organizations reported a wide variety of benefits, and current and planned uses for project findings, ranging from internal program evaluation and planning to external outreach, education, and advocacy. Conclusions: Facilitators and drivers of successful partnerships are essential for project success and sustained community engagement. Our data and experience suggest that documented community benefit is essential for long-term engagement, adding to the current literature for community engagement in medical education and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.