ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Nasal Wash in Patients with Upper Respiratory Tract Diseases.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nasal irrigation is a standard therapeutic option to clean the upper airways to remove abundant secretions and harmful substances. The Nasal Wash (SIIT, Milan, Italy) sinus irrigation system contains saline, bicarbonates, and polyethylene glycol. Objective: The present randomized controlled trial evaluated and compared the Nasal Wash hypertonic solution (NW-HS) with physiological saline (PS) in patients with nasal symptoms common to different upper airway diseases (infectious rhinitis, allergic rhinitis, and acute and chronic rhinosinusitis). Methods: The symptomatic patients were divided into two groups: those receiving NW-HS 1 to 2 times a day for 7 days and those receiving PS 1 to 2 times a day for 7 days. The primary efficacy measures included total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and the score on the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS), assessed at baseline and during the treatment period. Results: In total, 70 patients participated in the trial: 35 were allocated to the NW-HS group and 35 to the PS group. In the NW-HS group, we observed a significant reduction in the TNSS over time, at rates higher than those of the PS group ( Conclusion: The present trial documented the efficacy and safety of NW-HS in the treatment of nasal symptoms common to upper respiratory tract disorders. Most of the beneficial effects appeared as early as three days after the beginning of the treatment. In addition, compared to PS, NW-HS showed impressive results; thus, it may represent a safe and valuable option in the non-pharmacological therapy for rhinitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.