Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735107›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

A foundation model for human-AI collaboration in medical literature mining.

Zifeng Wang, Lang Cao, Qiao Jin, Joey Chan, Nicholas Wan, Behdad Afzali, Hyun-Jin Cho, Chang-In Choi, Mehdi Emamverdi, Manjot K Gill and 13 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Zifeng WangSchool of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Lang CaoSchool of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Qiao JinDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joey ChanDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nicholas WanDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Behdad AfzaliKidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hyun-Jin ChoCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chang-In ChoiCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mehdi EmamverdiNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Manjot K GillDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sun-Hyung KimCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yijia LiDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yi LiuDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Hanley OngDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Justin RousseauDepartment of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Irfan SheikhDepartment of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jenny J WeiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ziyang XuDepartment of Dermatology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher M ZallekOSF HealthCare Illinois Neurological Institute, Peoria, IL, USA.
Kyungsang KimCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yifan PengDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Zhiyong LuDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jimeng SunSchool of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

Unravelling immunoregulatory circuits of tissue inflammationZIADK075149 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI AFZALI, BEHDAD · 2019 to 2025
$19.3M
A New Therapy for Bowel Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryR44DK075149 · NIDDK · THERASOURCE, LLC · PI JACOB, ASHA · 2010 to 2012
$1.2M
New Therapy for Bowel Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryR43DK075149 · NIDDK · THERASOURCE, LLC · PI WU, RONGQIAN · 2006 to 2007
$288k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK075149NIDDK NIH HHS R43 DK075149NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK075149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic literature review is essential for evidence-based medicine, requiring comprehensive analysis of clinical trial publications. However, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) models for medical literature mining has been limited by insufficient training and evaluation across broad therapeutic areas and diverse tasks. Here, we present LEADS, an AI foundation model for study search, screening, and data extraction from medical literature. The model is trained on 633,759 instruction data points in LEADSInstruct, curated from 21,335 systematic reviews, 453,625 clinical trial publications, and 27,015 clinical trial registries. We showed that LEADS demonstrates consistent improvements over four cutting-edge generic large language models (LLMs) on six tasks. Furthermore, LEADS enhances expert workflows by providing supportive references following expert requests, streamlining processes while maintaining high-quality results. A study with 16 clinicians and medical researchers from 14 different institutions revealed that experts collaborating with LEADS achieved a recall of 0.81 compared to 0.77 experts working alone in study selection, with a time savings of 22.6%. In data extraction tasks, experts using LEADS achieved an accuracy of 0.85 versus 0.80 without using LEADS, alongside a 26.9% time savings. These findings highlight the potential of specialized medical literature foundation models to outperform generic models, delivering significant quality and efficiency benefits when integrated into expert workflows for medical literature mining.

Identifiers

PMID40735107
PMCPMC12306811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.