Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735077›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

SNRAware: Improved Deep Learning MRI Denoising with SNR Unit Training and G-factor Map Augmentation.

Hui Xue, Sarah M Hooper, Iain Pierce, Rhodri H Davies, John Stairs, Joseph Naegele, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Charlotte Manisty, James C Moon, Thomas A Treibel and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hui XueMicrosoft Research, Health Futures, Redmond, WA, USA.
Sarah M HooperNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Iain PierceBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rhodri H DaviesInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
John StairsMicrosoft Research, Health Futures, Redmond, WA, USA.
Joseph NaegeleMicrosoft Research, Health Futures, Redmond, WA, USA.
Adrienne E Campbell-WashburnNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Charlotte ManistyBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
James C MoonBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Thomas A TreibelBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Peter KellmanMicrosoft Research, Health Futures, Redmond, WA, USA.
Michael S HansenMicrosoft Research, Health Futures, Redmond, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a new deep learning MR denoising method that leverages quantitative noise distribution information from the reconstruction process to improve denoising performance and generalization. Methods: This retrospective study trained 14 different transformer and convolutional models with two backbone architectures on a large dataset of 2,885,236 images from 96,605 cardiac retro-gated cine complex series acquired at 3T. The proposed training scheme, termed SNRAware, leverages knowledge of the MRI reconstruction process to improve denoising performance by (1) simulating large, high quality, and diverse synthetic datasets, and (2) providing quantitative information about the noise distribution to the model. In-distribution testing was performed on a hold-out dataset of 3000 samples with performance measured using PSNR and SSIM, with ablation comparison without the noise augmentation. Out-of-distribution tests were conducted on cardiac real-time cine, first-pass cardiac perfusion, and neuro and spine MRI, all acquired at 1.5T, to test model generalization across imaging sequences, dynamically changing contrast, different anatomies, and field strengths. Results: The in-distribution tests showed that SNRAware training resulted in the best performance for all 14 models tested, better than those trained without the proposed synthetic data generation process or knowledge of the noise distribution. Models trained without any reconstruction knowledge were the most inferior. The improvement was architecture agnostic and shown for both convolution and transformer attention-based models; among them, the transformer models outperformed their convolutional counterparts and training with 3D input tensors improved performance over only using 2D images. The best model found in the in-distribution test generalized well to out-of-distribution samples, delivering 6.5× and 2.9× CNR improvement for real-time cine and perfusion imaging, respectively. Further, a model trained with 100% cardiac cine data generalized well to a T1 MPRAGE neuro 3D scan and T2 TSE spine MRI. Conclusions: An SNRAware training scheme was proposed to leverage information from the MRI reconstruction process in deep learning denoising training, resulting in improved performance and good generalization properties.

Identifiers

PMID40735077
PMCPMC12306816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.