ArticleBMJ neurology open2025
Relationship between brain atrophy and disability in a multi-site multiple sclerosis registry.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In a retrospective multicentre cohort study, we explored the association between brain atrophy and multiple sclerosis (MS) disability using different MRI scanners and protocols at multiple sites. Methods: Relapse-onset MS patients were included if they had two clinical MRIs 12 months apart and ≥2 Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Percentage brain volume change (PBVC), percentage grey matter change (PGMC), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) lesion volume change, whole brain volume (BV), grey matter volume (GMV), FLAIR lesion volume and T1 hypointense lesion volume were assessed by icobrain. Disability was measured by EDSS scores and 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP). Results: Of the 260 relapse-onset MS patients included, 204 (78%) MRI pairs were performed in the same scanner and 56 (22%) pairs were from different scanners. 93% of patients were on treatment and mean PBVC was -0.26% (±0.52). During the median follow-up of 2.8 years from the second MRI, median EDSS change was 0.0 and 12% patients experienced 6-month CDP. Cross-sectional BV and GMV at the later MRI showed a trend for association with CDP (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; p=0.06). Only BV at the later MRI was associated with EDSS score (β -0.03, SE 0.01, p<0.001) and the rate of EDSS change over time (β -0.001, SE 0.0003, p=0.02). There was no association between longitudinal PBVC or PGMC and CDP or EDSS (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this highly treated MS cohort with low disability accrual, only cross-sectional BV showed an association with future EDSS scores, while no MRI metric predicted 6-month CDP. These findings highlight the limitations of current clinical MRI measures in predicting disability worsening in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.