ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Phyllotaxy and environmental factors influences on leaf trait dimensions in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Light and soil nutrients are strong drivers of leaf trait variation, but the relative importance in shaping intraspecific trait variation across leaf developmental gradients remains poorly assessed. Previous studies mostly focused on single traits, while fewer have employed multidimensional trait syndromes framework to explore how plants optimize resource use and maintain physiological homeostasis. Methods: We measured leaf economic traits (e.g., specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen concentration) and stomatal traits (e.g., stomatal density, size) in leaflets at different phyllotactic positions of the compound-leaved species Results: We found that (1) specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration significantly increase along the phyllotaxy gradient (from phyllotaxy 1 to 6), while leaf dry matter content, leaf thickness, and stomatal density significantly decrease. No significant variation in the dimensions of economic and stomatal traits was observed across the phyllotaxy gradient; (2) phyllotaxy modulates trait coordination, with decoupled economic and stomatal traits at phyllotaxy 1 but coupled relationships at phyllotaxy 2-6; (3) environmental factors had a greater impact on economic trait dimensions variation, whereas phyllotaxy was more important for stomatal trait dimensions. Discussion: Our study highlights the significance of trait dimensions in understanding plant functional strategies. We emphasize that the influence of environmental factors or phyllotaxy on trait variation is trait-specific, indicating distinct mechanisms for resource acquisition and water use. We recommend considering phyllotaxy when predicting plant responses to environmental changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.