ArticleBMJ public health2025
Barriers to breast cancer-related care among women in Pakistan: a systematic review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Where do delays occur? A systematic review of the barriers to early breast cancer diagnosis across South Africa's health system.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Household Income on Clinical Presentation and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Barriers to breast cancer (BCa)-related care contribute majorly to a high mortality among Pakistani women. However, our understanding of these barriers is limited to studies that are limited geographically and by their small sample sizes. The objective of this study was to summarise all evidence and provide a comprehensive, one-stop manuscript which could assist interventionists who seek to address these barriers. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar and performed a citation search to search for eligible studies published since inception to 24 November 2024. Eligibility criteria: Observational studies that evaluated barriers to BCa-related care among Pakistani females were eligible. Data extraction and synthesis: We used the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool to assess the risk of bias. Data were extracted into a template, classified into themes using inductive reasoning and analysed descriptively. Results: We found 37 studies which were eligible. In these, we identified eight barriers to BCa-related care for Pakistani women: lack of awareness, accessibility, affordability, fear, hesitancy, cultural traditions, commitments and physician error. Of these, physician error contributed the least, while lack of awareness, cultural traditions, fear and poor accessibility were most commonly reported. Importantly, these barriers to BCa-related care vary depending on the context (eg, population, geographical area, presence or absence of BCa). Most barriers influence others (eg, poverty leads to inaccessible healthcare), portraying a complex and multifaceted scenario. Conclusions: Barriers to BCa-related care can be grouped into eight broad themes. Their subthemes are diverse and interlinked. Policy-makers need to consider all barriers, as ignoring one can limit the effectiveness of their interventions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024612667.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.