ArticleBMJ public health2025
Frequency of myopia and associated risk factors in the adolescent population (10-16 years) of Karachi, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of myopia and explore its risk factors in adolescents aged 10-16 years in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods and analysis: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 335 adolescents from 4 public and 2 private schools in Karachi. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess associations between myopia and various risk factors. Results: The study found that the prevalence of myopia was 54% among participants. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between myopia and sleep quality as well as time spent on reading/writing activities. Adolescents with a sleep quality score greater than or equal to 4 had a 1.63 times higher likelihood of myopia compared with those with lower scores (95% CI 1.21 to 2.19, p=0.001). Myopia was 1.63 times more common among those spending 1-2 hours on reading/writing (95% CI 1.02 to 2.61, p=0.04) and 1.95 times more prevalent in those spending over 4 hours on these activities during weekends (95% CI 1.12 to 3.40, p=0.02) compared with those with no such activities. Conclusions: The study indicates a high prevalence of myopia in the study population, and this can be significantly attributed to poor sleep quality and extended reading/writing times. The results suggest the potential for targeted interventions to address these risk factors and mitigate the rising prevalence of myopia. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for future longitudinal research to establish causal relationships between these risk factors and myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.