Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Efficacy and safety of modified dual knife fistulotomy in complex ERCP cases involving type 3 papilla.

Qinkai Li, Mingjie Qian, Wei Cai, Zhenguo Qiao, Jianhong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qinkai LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mingjie QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Wei CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhenguo QiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jianhong ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Cannulating protruding or pendulous type 3 papilla presents a higher level of difficulty in ERCP. Although pre-cutting papillotomy is a viable strategy, it is not without challenges. To overcome this issue, we developed a modified dual knife fistulotomy technique. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a modified dual knife fistulotomy technique for achieving challenging biliary cannulation in type 3 papilla. Methods: This retrospective study investigated consecutive patients who underwent ERCP and dual knife fistulotomy for challenging biliary cannulation from 2017 to 2023. The study assessed the rates of technical success and adverse events related to dual knife fistulotomy during ERCP. Results: During the study period, a total of 380 patients with native type 3 papilla underwent ERCP. The initial success rate of biliary cannulation using the standard cannulation approach alone was 81.3% (309/380), which improved to 94.5% (359/380) by incorporating the double guidewire technique. Furthermore, the success rate further increased to 99.7% (379/380) with the addition of dual knife fistulotomy. Dual knife fistulotomy achieved a technical success rate of 95.2% (20/21) while no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Dual knife fistulotomy is an effective technique for gaining access to the biliary system in cases of unsuccessful standard cannulation of type 3 papilla, with no significant increase in the risk of adverse events.

Indexed as

biliary cannulationdual knifeERCPfistulotomy techniquetype 3 papilla

Identifiers

PMID40734924
PMCPMC12303978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.