ArticleCureus2025
Pregnancy Outcomes Following Planned Cesarean Section: Experience From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bahrain.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile current clinical guidelines recommend scheduling repeat cesarean sections (CSs) at or after 39 weeks of gestation to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes, emergent circumstances, such as spontaneous labor or acute maternal or fetal concerns, may necessitate performing the procedure prior to reaching this gestational age. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with repeat CSs performed either before or at/after 39 weeks of gestation. In addition, it identified the indications of emergency repeat cesarean sections (EmRCS). The findings are expected to inform clinical decision-making and contribute to improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on repeat CSs at King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain, from 2017 to 2021. Deliveries were categorized by gestational age (<39 weeks vs. ≥39 weeks) and by type, elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) versus EmRCS. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression, were used to assess associations between spontaneous labor, maternal characteristics, and neonatal outcomes.
resultsAmong 1421 women, 330 (23%) underwent repeat CSs at or beyond 39 weeks, while 235 (17%) were classified as EmRCS. A significantly higher incidence of EmRCS was observed in deliveries at or after 39 weeks (P < 0.05). Notably, spontaneous labor was responsible for 55% (n = 137) of EmRCS cases and was weakly negatively correlated with body mass index (r = -0.07, p = 0.012) and positively correlated with the number of previous CSs (r = 0.116, p < 0.001). Logistic regression indicated that women with more than one previous CS had increased odds of entering spontaneous labor (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.41-3.81; p = 0.001). Moreover, 9% of neonates (n = 128) required neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, with a significantly higher rate among those delivered before 39 weeks (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between elective CSs performed before or after 39 weeks.
conclusionERCS scheduled at 39 weeks appears to reduce the risk of neonatal respiratory complications. However, the risk of spontaneous labor, leading to emergency repeat procedures, remains a concern, particularly among women with multiple previous CSs. These findings underscore the importance of individualized patient counseling and delivery planning to balance the benefits of fetal maturity against the risks associated with early, unplanned delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.