Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734869›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale.

Maria Dagla, Irina Mrvoljak-Theodoropoulou, Vassilis Daglas, Evangelia Antoniou, Ioanna Mouchtari, Calliope Dagla, Dimitra Sotiropoulou, Eleni Tsolaridou, Despoina Karagianni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria DaglaDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Irina Mrvoljak-TheodoropoulouDepartment of Psychology, National Kapodistrian University, Athens, GRC.
Vassilis DaglasDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.
Evangelia AntoniouDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Ioanna MouchtariDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.
Calliope DaglaDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.
Dimitra SotiropoulouDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.
Eleni TsolaridouDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.
Despoina KaragianniDay Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), Non-Profit Organization "FAINARETI", Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It has been widely acknowledged in the literature that the most reliable and valid method of assessing perinatal anxiety is through reliable and valid measures, as anxiety is highly prevalent among women during the perinatal period. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and the validity and reliability of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) in Greek women in the perinatal period. To date, no study has been conducted in Greece assessing the psychometric properties of the PASS. Methods This is a retrospective study of 518 women who gave birth in Athens, Greece, between January 2016 and January 2019. The participants were followed from pregnancy up to the first postnatal year within a healthcare intervention, carried out at the Day Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), run by the Non-Profit Organization FAINARETI. Measures used in the study were the PASS and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Results To assess the internal reliability of the PASS, two different internal consistency indices were calculated, showing a high reliability level. The data had a positive skewing effect, indicating low reported levels of perinatal anxiety among the participants. Correlation analysis between the PASS and the EPDS showed good convergence scale validity, while conducted factor analyses demonstrated fitting construct validity. Conclusions These findings suggest that the four-factor PASS appears to be adequate for the Greek population of women in the perinatal period.

Indexed as

antenatalpassperinatal anxietyperinatal periodpostpartumpregnancyreliabilityscreeningvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40734869
PMCPMC12307033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.