ArticleCureus2025
Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background It has been widely acknowledged in the literature that the most reliable and valid method of assessing perinatal anxiety is through reliable and valid measures, as anxiety is highly prevalent among women during the perinatal period. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and the validity and reliability of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) in Greek women in the perinatal period. To date, no study has been conducted in Greece assessing the psychometric properties of the PASS. Methods This is a retrospective study of 518 women who gave birth in Athens, Greece, between January 2016 and January 2019. The participants were followed from pregnancy up to the first postnatal year within a healthcare intervention, carried out at the Day Center for the Care of the Mental Health of Women (Perinatal Mental Health Disorders), run by the Non-Profit Organization FAINARETI. Measures used in the study were the PASS and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Results To assess the internal reliability of the PASS, two different internal consistency indices were calculated, showing a high reliability level. The data had a positive skewing effect, indicating low reported levels of perinatal anxiety among the participants. Correlation analysis between the PASS and the EPDS showed good convergence scale validity, while conducted factor analyses demonstrated fitting construct validity. Conclusions These findings suggest that the four-factor PASS appears to be adequate for the Greek population of women in the perinatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.