ArticleCureus2025
Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gait Biomechanics, Symmetry Restoration, and Functional Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and systemic inflammation: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Preoperative Cryoneurolysis in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts in Pain Control and Opioid Stewardship.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a leading cause of disability among the elderly population, characterized by chronic pain and functional impairment. When conservative treatments fail to provide relief, total knee replacement (TKR) emerges as the gold standard surgical intervention. The effectiveness of TKR depends on appropriate patient selection, surgical technique, and structured post-operative rehabilitation. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics, Shri B M Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India, between April 2023 and December 2024. A total of 33 patients over the age of 50 years with grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritis were included after failure of non-operative therapy. All patients underwent TKR using the anteromedial parapatellar approach with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at post-operative day 5, 3 months, and six months using the Knee Society Score (KSS©). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate score progression and its association with demographic variables. Results All patients had poor pre-operative KSS© (<60). By day 5 post-surgery, only 6.1% (2 out of 33) showed fair scores, while the majority remained poor. At the three-month follow-up, 72.7% (24 out of 33) of patients achieved excellent scores, and 27.2% (9 out of 33) had good scores. By six months, 100% of patients had excellent KSS©. Statistically significant associations were noted between KSS© scores at three months and both age (p=0.007) and gender (p<0.001). Complications were minimal, with only 9.1% (3 out of 33) reporting restricted range of motion and 3% (1 out of 33) experiencing superficial infection. Conclusion Primary TKR significantly improves clinical and functional outcomes in patients with osteoarthritic knees. Early post-operative recovery patterns may vary by age and gender, but outcomes equalize by six months. With proper surgical technique and rehabilitation, TKR proves to be a safe and highly effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.