Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734844›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of Productivity and Quality of Publications Derived From Doctoral Theses and the Scientific Performance of Graduates at a Romanian Medical and Pharmacy University.

Andreea I Pop, Mira Florea, Simona Mirel, Lucia M Lotrean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreea I PopDepartment of Community Medicine, Research Center in Preventive Medicine, Health Promotion and Sustainable Development, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, ROU.
Mira FloreaDepartment of Community Medicine, Discipline of Family Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, ROU.
Simona MirelDepartment Fourth Pharmacy, Discipline of Medical Devices, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, ROU.
Lucia M LotreanDepartment of Community Medicine, Research Center in Preventive Medicine, Health Promotion and Sustainable Development, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, ROU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study focuses on assessing the productivity and quality of publications resulting from doctoral research as well as the scientific performance of individual researchers at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. It analyzes scientific publication rates before, during, and after doctoral school. We analyzed the bibliometric indicators of publications indexed in the Web of Science database, which are derived from doctoral research and feature graduates as first authors, as well as the factors that might impact the research outcomes. Design and setting This investigation is a longitudinal observational study conducted from January to March 2023 at Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The study employed both descriptive and analytical research methods. The sample comprises public information about 169 doctoral (PhD) candidates who successfully completed the doctoral program between 2019 and 2021. We collected data from various public databases, including the university's website, the university library, and the Web of Science Core Collections. Main outcome measures and research productivity The primary outcome measures include gender, graduation years, qualification, teaching position, doctorate final grade, and Hirsch index (H-index). The productivity of research includes the total number of WoS-indexed publications, conference proceedings, and manuscripts in various databases. Research quality and visibility are represented by total citations, journal impact factors and journal rankings. Factors influencing research dissemination: The factors that influence research dissemination include the number of co-authors, financial support, and interdisciplinary/international collaborations. The publication timeline includes research output before, during, and after graduation. Results At the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, doctoral theses produced high-quality research; 332 (91%) of the publications were indexed in WoS journals with JIF, 136 (38%) of these publications were in top-ranked journals, and 298 (81%) of the publications received citations. Before they graduated, graduates also published the findings of other studies, and some of them continued publishing after graduation. The graduation qualification strongly correlated with the graduates' publications' productivity, impact, and visibility. The study found that financial support and international collaboration had a positive influence on the publication's visibility and quantity. Conclusions This study provides new quantitative and qualitative evidence that can enhance discussions regarding the assessment of academic performance and the mentoring of doctoral students. Our study identifies various factors that can influence the results of research.

Indexed as

doctoral studentmedical education and researchpublication ratescientific publication indicatorsthesis

Identifiers

PMID40734844
PMCPMC12305480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.