Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734812›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2025

Larger fruit consumption helps constipation patients: socioeconomic analysis from 2005 - 2010 NHANES matched cohorts.

Thanathip Suenghataiphorn, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Narathorn Kulthamrongsri, Kanokphong Suparan, Tuntanut Lohawatcharagul, Natchaya Polpichai, Jerapas Thongpiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thanathip SuenghataiphornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Griffin Hospital, Derby, CT, United States.
Pojsakorn DanpanichkulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Narathorn KulthamrongsriMayo Clinic, AZ, United States.
Kanokphong SuparanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Tuntanut LohawatcharagulKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natchaya PolpichaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States.
Jerapas ThongpiyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to utilize a large-scale database to better understand its efficacy in this subpopulation group. Background: Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal complaints in the United States whose alleviation often requires multiple interventions and behavioral changes. Fruits are often one of the dietary recommendations for constipated patients, but their efficacy remains mixed. Methods: We examined the nationwide cross-sectional study in the 2006 - 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Patients over 20 years old were stratified into fruit-consumption and non-fruit-consumption groups. We excluded patients who had intestinal disease, colon cancer, celiac disease, and were pregnant. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between fruit intake and constipation status as recorded in the database. Results: A total of 12,192 patients were included in our study. The average age was 50.5, and 49.56% of the population are Caucasians, followed by 26.43% of Hispanics; 9.84% had constipation; and 70.04% had fruit consumption. After adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, education, marital status, poverty ratio, body mass index, food healthy index, physical activity, supplemental usage, medications, smoking, and alcohol usage, patients who had fruit consumption had a lower odd of constipation (aOR 0.83, 95%CI (0.72, 0.95), p=0.008). Further, patients who had larger fruit intake were likely to be less constipated. Post-propensity score matching revealed similar statistically significant. Conclusion: Fruit intake, as well larger amount of fruit intake, was associated with lesser odds of constipation. Additional investigations in the fruit subtype, as well as the longitudinal relationship, are required to understand this relationship.

Indexed as

ConstipationDietFruit intakeFruitsNHANESNutrition

Identifiers

PMID40734812
PMCPMC12301543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.