ReviewGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2025
Prognostic value of circulating uric acid in gastrointestinal cancers, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of serum uric acid in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI). Background: There is growing evidence that high serum uric acid may be used as a potential prognostic marker in gastrointestinal malignancies. However, there are inconsistencies in the reported findings. Methods: Related studies were identified by searching the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, independently up until 30 October 2023. Relevant analyses were carried out to deal with heterogeneity in the data. According to the inclusion criteria, we used English original papers reporting prognostic value of serum/plasma uric acid to determine hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in patients with GI cancers. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to ascertain the association of uric acid levels with gastrointestinal cancer (GI) risk. The inconsistency index (I2) was used to calculate the level of heterogeneity among the selected studies. The quality of each study was evaluated by Newcastle-OTTAWA Scales (NOS). Results: A total of 9 papers with 95.285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The findings indicated a significant association between serum uric acid and poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (HR=1.477, 95% CI 1.165-1.873, P= 0.001). Further, in Subgroup analysis we found that patients would have poor survival rate among different cut-offs of uric acid, ≥ 5mg/dl, HR= 1.403, 95% CI=1.150-1.711, P=0.001 vs cut-off <5mg/dl, HR=1.54, 95% CI=1.140-2.063, P=0.005. Conclusion: Serum uric acid level is significantly linked to survival outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Serum uric acid levels may be an effective prognostic marker associated with clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Given the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis and high heterogeneity, we suggest that a more comprehensive study is required to achieve more robust results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.