Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734798›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Tracheostomy in Children: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India.

Seenivasan Subramani, Poovazhagi Varadarajan, Nisha Rangabashyam, Nirmakumar Jayaraman, Sarath Balaji, Jegan M Rajajeyavel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Authors Response: Comments on "Tracheostomy in Children - Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India".Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Tracheostomy in Children: A Call for Deeper Reflection.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seenivasan SubramaniDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-1702
Poovazhagi VaradarajanDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-9652
Nisha RangabashyamDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8609
Nirmakumar JayaramanDepartment of ENT, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6619-6310
Sarath BalajiDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-9062
Jegan M RajajeyavelDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9574-5632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Data on tracheostomy in children are scarce in India. Hence, our study aimed to determine the indications, timing, complications, and outcomes of tracheostomy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Patients and methods: We carried out a single-center ambispective study in children aged 1 month to 12 years undergoing tracheostomy in the PICU from February 2019 to April 2024. Data on age, gender, indications, complications, outcome, and follow-up of post-tracheostomy patients were collected and analyzed. Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients underwent tracheostomy. Neurological illness (57.4%) was the reason for admission in the majority of children. Prolonged ventilation was the most common indication for tracheostomy (50%). The median (IQR) duration of ventilation before tracheostomy was 21 (14-27) days. The mean (SD) duration of weaning to "T piece" was 9.3 (7.8) days. Forty-six children died in the hospital due to primary illness and 4 (2.9%) tracheostomy-related deaths. Complications were observed in 58 (42.6%) children. Tracheal aspirate growth was observed in 58 (42.6%). Mothers were the primary caregivers in 127 (93.4%). The median (IQR) duration of PICU stay was 28 (20-43.5) days. Forty-nine (36%) children were decannulated. Conclusion: Tracheostomy is a safe procedure in the PICU, and the mortality is mainly due to underlying illness. How to cite this article: Subramani S, Varadarajan P, Rangabashyam N, Jayaraman N, Balaji S, Rajajeyavel JM. Tracheostomy in Children: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(7):592-596.

Indexed as

ComplicationsIndicationsT pieceTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID40734798
PMCPMC12302192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.