ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025
An Overview of
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Patients and methods: This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a Tertiary Care Teaching University Hospital. All blood cultures received in the laboratory from October 2022 to September 2023 were included in the study. They were processed using the automated BD BACTEC system and species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) were performed using the VITEK 2 Compact system, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results: From 10,449 blood cultures received during the study period, 13.18% showed bacterial growth. Of these, 30.33% were gram-positive, with Conclusion: Findings of this study underscore the urgent need for stringent infection control measures and prudent antibiotic stewardship to effectively manage and prevent VRE infections. How to cite this article: Rajni E, Jorwal A, Goyal K, Grag VK. An Overview of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.